Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

33 Va. App. 536

Clark v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided October 3, 2000

Court of Appeals of Virginia · decided 2000-10-03

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently September 2001

2 state decisions

Relies on 31 Va. App. 96 - Clark v. Commonwealth

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2000-10-03

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1UPON A REHEARING EN BANC

¶2On November 30, 1999, a panel of this Court reversed and remanded the convictions of Jack Enic Clark for sodomy and statutory rape. See Clark v. Commonwealth, 31 Va.App. 96, 521 S.E.2d 313 (1999). We granted the Commonwealth’s petition for rehearing en banc.

¶3Upon rehearing en banc, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed without opinion by an evenly divided Court. Accordingly, the opinion previously rendered by a panel of this Court on November 30, 1999, is withdrawn and the mandate entered on that date is vacated. The appellant shall pay to the Commonwealth of Virginia thirty dollars damages.

¶4Chief Judge Fitzpatrick, Judges Coleman, Bumgardner and Humphreys voted to affirm said judgment.

¶5Judges Benton, Elder, Bray and Senior Judge Cole voted to reverse the judgment of the trial court.

¶6This order shall be published and certified to the trial court.

/33/vaapp/536 · .json · Public domain