Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 33 Va. App. 682 - Ford v. Commonwealth

33 Va. App. 682 - Ford v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
April 2016
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Ragan v. Woodcroft Village Apartments · Ridgeway v. United States · Rease v. Commonwealth · 4 Va. App. 3 - Clark v. Commonwealth · 13 Va. App. 655 - Williamson v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Since, at all times subsequent to his indictment for the escape felony defendant was held by the Commonwealth in her penal institutions and was available for trial in the court in which the case was pending, we are of the opinion that he was being “held ... for trial” within the meaning of the speedy trial statute and was entitled to claim its protection.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.