Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 33 Wash. 2d 603 - State v. Grabinski

33 Wash. 2d 603 - State v. Grabinski’s Empirical Analysis

1949

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
March 1995
most recently cited

2 district · 11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 1995

2 district · 11 state decisions

70194919501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ness v. Supervisors of Elections · State v. Bowen & Co. · People v. Bellet · City of Seattle v. Gervasi · State ex rel. Hoffman v. Justus

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is a well-recognized rule of constitutional law that, where the unconstitutional portion of an act is severable from the rest, the portion which is constitutional may stand, and that which is unconstitutional may be stricken out and rejected.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “No agreement is to be expected between different individuals as to what items should be sold on the day of rest, and it is generally held that the legislature has the right to designate the articles which can be legally sold on that day.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Such legislation ... should be regarded as day-of-rest legislation rather than as Sabbath or Sunday closing laws,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.