Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 33 Wash. 2d 847 - State v. Gillingham

33 Wash. 2d 847 - State v. Gillingham’s Empirical Analysis

1949

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
2
states following
November 1990
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently November 1990

13 state decisions

70194919501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Goettina · State v. Payne · State v. Pienick · State v. Riggs · State v. Donckers

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]n order to sustain a conviction on circumstantial evidence, the circumstances proved by the state must not only be consistent with each other and consistent with the hypothesis that the accused is guilty, but also must be inconsistent with any hypothesis or theory which would establish, or tend to establish, his innocence.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.