33 Wash. App. 304 - State v. Huff’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
11
cited by 11 later decisions
2
states following
July 1999
most recently cited
11 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Aguilar v. Texas · Spinelli v. United States · Michigan v. Summers · 88 Wash. 2d 899 - State v. Partin · 95 Wash. 2d 706 - State v. Lair
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Search the premises . . . and to search the person(s) of John Doe ...” At the time the police went to the residence to execute the warrant, they did not know the identity of the occupants. During the search the police found personal papers and documents of Mr. Huff and some contraband. Then Mr. Huff appeared and was searched. Marijuana was found on his person. Mr. Huff argued the search of his person was improper because the warrant did not name him but rather”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“had personally observed a quantity of marijuana in the residence”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.