33 Wash. App. 720 - State v. Bledsoe’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
11
cited by 11 later decisions
3
states following
September 1991
most recently cited
11 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Chapman v. State of California · Edwards v. Arizona · Brewer v. Williams · 96 Wash. 2d 383 - State v. Hartzog
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The constitutional requirement is only that the jury be instructed as to each element of the offense charged. . . . The failure of the court ... to define further one of those elements is not within the ambit of the constitutional rule.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“We conclude that Bledsoe’s statement that his attorney told him not to speak to police about the case did not invoke his right to counsel under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments. Bledsoe did not ask for his attorney. Rather, he merely told [the detective] what his attorney had advised.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Mada
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.