33 Wash. App. 741 - State v. Theroff’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently September 2002
14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 95 Wash. 2d 385 - State v. Theroff · 92 Wash. 2d 967 - State v. Huelett · 94 Wash. 2d 489 - State v. Eilts · 25 Wash. App. 590 - State v. Theroff · 96 Wash. 2d 500 - In Re the Personal Restraint of Habbitt
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A trial court's sentencing authority is limited to that expressly found in the statutes. If the statutory provisions are not followed, the action of the court is void.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“[n]or can the payment be considered restitution because restitution, as a condition of probation, must be related to the crime and can only involve victims who are named in the information.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“restitution to any person or persons who may have suffered loss or damage by reason of the commission of the crime in question”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.