33 Wash. App. 753 - State v. Gilbert’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 49 Wash. 2d 664 - State v. Rinkes · 91 Wash. 2d 197 - Hart v. Peoples National Bank · 97 Wash. 2d 182 - In Re R. · 83 Wash. 2d 383 - State v. Bell · 25 Wash. App. 282 - State v. Byrd
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“. In State v. Gilbert, 33 Wn. App. 753, 756 , 657 P.2d 350 (1983) (involving a different Gilbert), Division Three of this court reached a contrary conclusion: We perceive the Legislature's intent in passing the first degree burglary statute as seeking to outlaw burglaries where the perpetrator is either armed with a deadly weapon or assaults someone during the course of the crime. Therefore, we hold the words”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Burglary in the first degree. (1) A person is guilty of burglary in the first degree if, with intent to commit a crime against a person or property therein, he enters or remains unlawfully in a dwelling and if, in entering or while in the dwelling or in immediate flight therefrom, the actor or another participant in the crime (a) is armed with a deadly weapon, or (b) assaults any person therein.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.