Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 33 WASHAPP 774 - State v. Rangel

State v. Rangel’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
December 2001
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 91 Wash. 2d 638 - State v. Wicke · 17 Wash. App. 261 - State v. Jones

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “THE COURT: Do you understand that there would be 12 jurors? THE DEFENDANT: Yes. THE COURT: And that they would have to be unanimous, in their finding of guilt? Every one of them would have to find you guilty? THE DEFENDANT: Yes. I understand. THE COURT: Okay. And you understand you would be presumed innocent until the charges were proven—or unless the charges were proven beyond a reasonable doubt by the State? THE DEFENDANT: Yes. THE COURT: And you understand you have a legal right to a jury of 12 members in this case? THE DEFENDANT: I'm not sure. My lawyer what the preference would be. MR. HERNANDEZ: I'm sorry, your Honor? THE COURT: Could you repeat that please, Mr. THE DEFENDANT: I'm not sure. My lawyer—what the preference would be. THE COURT: My only concern—you understand there would be 12 jurors? THE DEFENDANT: Yes. THE COURT: Do you desire to give up that right? THE DEFENDANT: Yes. THE COURT: All right. Mr. Hernandez, do you need additional time to talk to your client to make sure—you want to talk to your client to make sure he understands that right? MR. HERNANDEZ: I think I do, your Honor. THE COURT: All right. You want to step out? MR. HERNANDEZ: Please. (Discussion off the record) THE COURT: We'll go back on the record. It's 10:40. Mr. Hernandez has met with his client for about three minutes. Three to five minutes. Mr. Hernandez, do you— MR. HERNANDEZ: He understands, and he wishes to proceed without a jury. THE COURT: Is that correct, sir? Mr. Vasquez, you desire”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Cases required to be tried by jury shall be so tried unless the defendant files a written waiver of a jury trial, and has consent of the court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.