Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 33 Wash. App. 859 - State v. Tyson

33 Wash. App. 859 - State v. Tyson’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
2
states following
March 2010
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently March 2010

15 state decisions

601983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 94 Wash. 2d 216 - State v. Green · 91 Wash. 2d 342 - State v. Boyer · 95 Wash. 2d 799 - State v. Wheeler · 92 Wash. 2d 357 - State v. Robinson · 28 Wash. App. 214 - State v. Gerber

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “, in addition to its ordinary meaning, includes any dwelling, fenced area, vehicle, railway car, cargo container, or any other structure used for lodging of persons or for carrying on business therein, or for the use, sale or deposit of goods; each unit of a building consisting of two or more units separately secured or occupied is a separate building; RCW 9A.04.110. The word”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Even where constitutional issues are involved, invited error precludes judicial review.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “. (Italics ours.) Tyson , at 862-63. There, uncontroverted evidence established that the semitrailer was either a cargo container or other structure used for the deposit of goods, and thus was a building for purposes of the burglary statute. Here, although the affidavit in support of probable cause infers some goods were stored in the backyard, the State's exhibits and arguments during the hearing confirmed that this was a fence enclosing a backyard, much like the backyard of any other private home. As such, it was not a”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.