Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 330 Ark. 287 - Slaton v. Slaton

Slaton v. Slaton’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

94
cited by 94 later decisions
1
states following
September 2022
most recently cited

94 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 94 later decisions — most recently September 2022 · most notably Travis v. State (1998), Ayers v. State (1998)

94 state decisions

3301997200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on General Motors Corporation v. Tate · Priest v. Polk · Porter v. Harshfield · Morrison v. Jennings · Mullinax v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 94 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “For these reasons, we find that the trial court did not have jurisdiction to enter the March 5, 1992 order modifying custody and child support. We reverse and remand for the trial court to determine the amount that Teresa owes in past-due child-support payments. This determination should take into account how long the September 26, 1991 child-support order remained in effect, in view of various orders entered subsequent to March 5, 1992, that may or may not have incorporated by reference the terms of the March 5, 1992 order.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Courts should not be guided blindly by titles but should look to the substance of motions to ascertain what they seek. It would not be in the interest of justice and fair play to be blindly guided by the title of a motion or pleading. We continue to abide by the well-established rule that a pleading will not be judged entirely by what it is labeled but also by what it contains.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “To correct any error or mistake or to prevent the miscarriage of justice, a decree or order of a circuit, chancery, or probate court may be modified or set aside on motion of the court or any party, with or without notice to any party, within ninety days of its having been filed with the clerk.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.