Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

330 F.2d 240

Docket No. 19028.

Perry v. Bammar

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

April 2, 1964, Certiorari Denied May 4, 1964, See 84 S.Ct. 1223.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1964-04-02

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently August 1968

3 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1964-04-02

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Julius Dwaine Perry, Sr., in pro. per.

Francis C. Whelan, U.S. Atty., Donald A. Fareed, Asst. U.S. Atty., Chief of Civil Section; and James R. Dooley, Asst. U.S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.

Before BARNES, MERRILL and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

Appellant appeals from a nonappealable order, namely, a dismissal of one defendant, the United States of America, in an action for slander (mislabeled an action for libel) upon the grounds the complaint failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, and for lack of jurisdiction.

¶2

Additionally, it is clear that the plaintiff has sued in the wrong forum.

¶3

Affirmed.

/330/f2d/240 · .json · Public domain