Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

330 F.2d 497

Docket No. 21025.

Taylor v. Holman

Second Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1964-04-01

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently April 1964

2 federal appellate ·

1 counsel of record

Relies on United States v. Leary

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1964-04-01

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Richmond M. Flowers, Atty. Gen., of Ala., Peter M. Lind, Asst. Atty. Gen., of Ala., Montgomery, Ala., for appellee.

Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, and RIVES and WISDOM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

This Court has studied the record and the briefs filed herein and considered all of the appellant's contentions. Since no error appears in the proceedings below, the order of the district court denying the application for a writ of habeas corpus is

¶2

Affirmed.

/330/f2d/497 · .json · Public domain