Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 330 F.2d 640 - Avery v. United States

Avery v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

330 F.2d 640 · 1964

Citation profile

106
cited by 106 later decisions
7
states following
January 2015
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 4 district · 17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 106 later decisions — most recently January 2015 · most notably Moden v. United States (2005), Samaad v. City of Dallas (1991)

11 federal appellate · 4 district · 17 state decisions

260196419701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1491 · 49 U.S.C. § 1301

Relies on United States v. Miller · United States v. Causby · Foti v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · United States v. Dickinson · United States v. Cress

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 106 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “that a new and further taking occurred in 1957”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “... even if it could be said that a taking occurred in November 1951 when the B-36 bombers commenced flying over plaintiffs’ land it certainly was at most only a partial taking and not such a taking as occurred when the B-52 flights commenced____[ 295 F.2d at 933 , 155 Ct.Cl. at 421.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “whether the introduction of larger, heavier, noisier aircraft can constitute a fifth amendment taking of an additional easement even though new aircraft do not violate the boundaries of the initial easement”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.