Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 330 F.2d 818 - Poletti v. Commissioner

Poletti v. Commissioner’s Empirical Analysis

1964

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
August 1989
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently August 1989

11 federal appellate · 1 district ·

90196419701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cohan v. Commissioner · Challenge Mfg. Co. v. Commissioner · Blackmer v. Commissioner · Hallmark Cards, Inc. v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We find it necessary to remand because the Tax Court did not apply the Cohan rule to that balance of the admittedly allowable expenditures over and above the stipulated amounts for the year 1956. We are not, however, prejudging its future findings in requiring that application of the rule would necessarily, in other years at issue, demand additional deductions other than the amounts already allowed by respondent. The Tax Court is the trier of the facts and could conceivably, depending on the evidence at retrial, find a different amount than allowed initially as deductible for the years 1955 and 1957.” Id., at 823-824 . (Emphasis supplied).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[O]ne should not be penalized taxwise for his business ingenuity in utilizing advertising techniques which do not conform to the practices of one whom he is naturally trying to surpass in profits.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““Simply stated, the issue is whether the Tax Court erred in failing to apply the Cohan rule to expenditures over and above those stipulated and allowed as deductible, even though finding that a portion thereof constituted deductible business expenses. We believe the Tax Court fell into error in this regard.” 330 F.2d 818 , at 820.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.