United States v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
330 F.3d 1209 · 2003
Citation profile
14 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2113 · 18 U.S.C. § 3553
Relies on Koon v. United States · Biodiversity Legal Foundation v. Badgley · United States v. Thames · United States v. Cantu · United States v. Eyler
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“committed the offense while suffering from a significantly reduced mental capacity.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. United States v. You“understand the wrongfulness of the behavior comprising the offense”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. United States v. You
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.