Artz v. Barnhart’s Empirical Analysis
330 F.3d 170 · 2003
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Relies on Washington State Department of Social & Health Services v. Guardianship Estate of Keffeler · State v. Krol · State v. Fields · United States v. Loney · Matter of Commitment of Edward S.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“confined by court order in an institution at public expense in connection with ... a verdict or finding that the individual is not guilty of [a criminal] offense by reason of insanity.”) 5 . The legislative history of Section 2320 shows this conjunctive formulation is no accident. (See Joint Statement on Trademark Counterfeiting Legislation, 130 Cong. Rec. 31673-74 (noting that Section 2320 synthesized a Senate proposal targeting”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the publicly available operating instructions for processing Social Security claims,” and though”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.