United States v. Toliver’s Empirical Analysis
330 F.3d 607 · 2003
Citation profile
16 federal appellate · 1 district · 7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently July 2022 · most notably United States v. Lee (2010), Hudson v. Jones (2003)
16 federal appellate · 1 district · 7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Chapman v. State of California · Faretta v. California · Kotteakos v. United States · United States v. Cronic
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“substantial and injurious effect or influence in determining the jury's verdict.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Clarifying the substantive elements of the charged offense ... or instructing a deadlocked jury ... affirmatively guides jurors as to how they should fulfill their decisionmaking function. But submitting verbatim specifically excerpted record testimony that the jury itself had requested does not similarly “instruct” the jury.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Some deprivations of the right to counsel are in this category [of per se reversible error].... The right to see a note from the jurors and comment on the response is not.” (citing Rushen, supra)). . In Hallmon , we left open the question whether violations of Rule 43 — in particular”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.