Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 330 F.3d 67 - United States v. Geronimo

United States v. Geronimo’s Empirical Analysis

330 F.3d 67 · 2003

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
January 2022
most recently cited

13 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently January 2022

13 federal appellate ·

120200320102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 21 U.S.C. § 951 (Controlled Substances Import and Export Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 952 · 21 U.S.C. § 960

Relies on United States v. Olano · United States v. Zannino · Isaksen v. Vermont Castings, Inc. · Nobile v. Schindler · United States v. Petrozziello

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “more likely than not that the declarant and the defendant were members of a conspiracy when the hearsay statement was made, and that the statement was in furtherance of the conspiracy.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[T]o convict a principal actor of importing a controlled substance, the prosecution must prove that the accused knew the drugs were imported.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Significantly, the trial court is not required to decide the Petrozziello question prior to admitting [purported coconspirator] statements under Rule 801(d)(2)(E), but may 'admit the statements provisionally, subject to its final Petrozziello determination at the close of all the evidence.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.