Young v. Gordon’s Empirical Analysis
330 F.3d 76 · 2003
Citation profile
34 federal appellate · 21 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 72 later decisions — most recently June 2024 · most notably Marie v. Allied Home Mortgage Corp. (2005), Esposito v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. (2009)
34 federal appellate · 21 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Foman v. Davis · Link v. Wabash Railroad · Chambers v. Nasco, Inc. · National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc. · State v. Simpson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 72 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[D]ismissal should not be viewed either as a sanction of first resort or as an automatic penalty for every failure to abide by a court order.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[w]hen noncompliance occurs, the ordering court should consider the totality of events and then choose from the broad universe of available sanctions in an effort to fit the punishment to the severity and circumstances of the violation.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“disobedience of court orders is inimical to the orderly administration of justice and, in and of itself, can constitute extreme misconduct.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.