Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 330 FSUPP 737 - In re Mack

In re Mack’s Empirical Analysis

1970

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
2
states following
September 1994
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently September 1994

6 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

60197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Moosman v. Joseph P. Blitz, Inc. · Ark-Tenn Distributing Corp. v. Breidt · Timmons v. United States · City of Norwich · 110 F. Supp. 644 - Ark-Tenn Distributing Corp. v. Breidt

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “. . . Failure to receive a request for admissions will not prevent a summary judgment based thereon; however, the record must show the request was mailed to the last known street address of the party concerned in compliance with F.R. Civ.P. 5 (b). (Citations omitted).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.