Calderon v. Sessions’s Empirical Analysis
2018
Citation profile
2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2242 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 5 U.S.C. § 706 · 8 U.S.C. § 1154 (§ 204 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1231 (§ 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on County of Sacramento v. Lewis · Reno v. Flores · United States Accardi v. Shaughnessy · Morton v. Ruiz · Janet Reno, Attorney General v. American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee et al.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“no court shall have jurisdiction to hear any cause or claim by or on behalf of any alien arising from the decision or action by the Attorney General to commence proceedings, adjudicate cases, or execute removal orders against any alien under this chapter.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“Petitioner here does not challenge ICE's prosecutorial discretion. Rather, Petitioner challenges ICE's legal authority to exercise such discretion when the subject of the removal order also has a right to seek relief made available by the DHS. The Court's review of ICE's legal authority is not foreclosed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (g). See e.g. , Zadvydas v. Davis , 533 U.S. 678 , 121 S.Ct. 2491 , 150 L.Ed.2d 653 (2001) (reviewing whether ICE has the statutory authority to detain an immigrant subject to a final removal order after the 90-day removal period).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Martinez v. Nielsen“[n]otwithstanding any other provision of law (statutory or nonstatutory), including section 2241 of Title 28, or any other habeas corpus provision ... a petition for review filed with an appropriate court of appeals in accordance with this section shall be the sole and exclusive means for judicial review of an order of removal”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.