Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 330 Mo. 1176 - State v. Creighton

State v. Creighton’s Empirical Analysis

1932

Citation profile

69
cited by 69 later decisions
1
states following
July 2019
most recently cited

69 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 69 later decisions — most recently July 2019 · most notably State v. Gregory (1936), State v. Tiedt (1950)

69 state decisions

180193219401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Malone · State v. Clough · State v. Burrell · State v. Stallings · State v. Bidstrup

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 69 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It has often been held a trial judge cannot pass upon his own -prejudice, and that the filing of a properly drawn application for change of venue (so-called) charging such prejudice disqualifies him except to direct the substitution of another judge. [State v. Myers, 322 Mo. 48, 51 , 14 S. W. (2d) 447 .] On the other hand, the mere filing of the application does not deprive the court of jurisdiction, which latter continues until an order is made transferring the cause. In the exercise of that jurisdiction, it is the duty of the court to determine whether the application is in due form and due time.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “"If there is substantial evidence of lawful provocation, the defendant is entitled to an instruction on manslaughter. Proof of an initial assault and battery upon him by the deceased is such evidence because it measures up to the standard exacted by the law and in point of fact warrants an inference that heat of passion was engendered thereby ."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “It is fundamental that neither the trial court nor this court can pass on the weight of the evidence in a criminal case; that function belongs to the jury.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.