State Ex Rel. Terry v. Holtkamp’s Empirical Analysis
1932
Citation profile
24 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently December 2008
24 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Wilson Company v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co. · Dahlberg v. Fisse · Hunt v. Searcy · Summet v. City Realty & Brokerage Co. · State ex rel. Paxton v. Guinotte
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“shall cause the alleged insane person to be notified of the proceeding by written notice stating the nature of the proceeding, time and place when such proceeding will be heard by the court, and that such person is entitled to be present at said hearing and to be assisted by counsel. Such notice shall be signed by the clerk under the seal of the court and served in person on the alleged insane person a reasonable time before the date set for such hearing . . . . (Italics ours.) From the admitted and undisputed facts, it seems clear that petitioner was not served with written notice”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Thus Section 450 requires that a written notice stating the nature of the proceedings signed by the judge shall be served in person on the alleged insane person a reasonable time bfore the date set for such hearing. . . . Certainly a reasonable time `before the date ' set for the hearing would not be notice to appear on the same day the notice was served. . . . The respondent asserts other inadequacies and infirmities in this notice. It is unnecessary to consider these matters because the notice on its face would not authorize a hearing on the day it was served.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“It seems to be contended by relator that such finding in the judgment itself is conclusive that Thomasson was duly served with notice as required by statute. Such a recital, however, in the judgment itself must give way to actual facts presented in the notice served.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.