¶1On October 28, 2004, the defendant was sentenced to the following: Count I: Commitment, to the Department of Corrections for a term of five (5) years, with two (2) years suspended, for the offense of Criminal Possession of Dangerous Drugs, a felony; and Count III: Commitment to the Department of Corrections for a term of seven (7) years, with four (4) years suspended, for the offense of Theft, a felony. Counts I and III shall run concurrently.
¶2On May 16, 2005, the defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.
¶3*50The defendant was present and was advised of his right to be represented by counsel. The defendant proceeded without counsel. The state was not represented.
¶4Before hearing the application, the defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.
¶5Rule 17 of the Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana provides that “the sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct, and the sentence will not be reduced or increased unless it is deemed clearly inadequate or excessive.” (§46-18-904(3), MCA).
¶6The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is inadequate or excessive.
¶7Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence shall be affirmed.
¶8Done in open Court this 16th day of May, 2005.
¶9DATED this 2nd day of June, 2005.