¶1On December 30, 2004, the defendant was sentenced to twenty (20) years in the Montana State Prison for the offense of DUI, a felony and Persistent Felony Offender. The Defendant is to be ineligible for parole until he completes the Department of Corrections chemical dependence, WATCH, and CP&R programs.
¶2On May 16, 2005, the defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.
¶3The defendant was present and was represented by Glen Neier. The state was represented by Ed Corrigan.
¶4Before hearing the application, the defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.
¶5Rule 17 of the Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana provides that “the sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct, and the sentence will not be reduced or increased unless it is deemed clearly inadequate or excessive.” (§46-18-904(3), MCA).
¶6The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is inadequate or excessive.
¶7Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence shall be affirmed.
¶8Done in open Court this 16 th day of May, 2005.
¶9*66DATED this 2nd day of June, 2005.