Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 330 N.C. 331 - Baker v. Martin

Baker v. Martin’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

66
cited by 66 later decisions
3
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

64 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 66 later decisions — most recently March 2019 · most notably Bush v. Holmes (2006), Hart v. State (2015)

64 state decisions

400199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Rodriguez v. Popular Democratic Party · Lemons v. Old Hickory Council, Boy Scouts of America, Inc. · State v. Conner · State Ex Rel. Martin v. Preston · Hobbs v. County of Moore

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 66 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A statute] will not be declared invalid unless its unconstitutionality be determined beyond reasonable doubt.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““[U]nder the doctrine of expressio unius est exclusio alterius, the expression of specific disqualifications implies the exclusion of any other disqualifications.” This doctrine is a commonly used tool of statutory construction, but . . . we have found no North Carolina case in which this doctrine has been used to interpret our Constitution. Perhaps this dearth of authority can be attributed to the fact that this doctrine flies directly in the face of one of the underlying principles of North Carolina constitutional law.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “Unless the Constitution expressly or by necessary implication restricts the actions of the legislative branch, the General Assembly is free to implement legislation as long as that legislation does not offend some specific constitutional provision.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.