Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 330 P.2d 607 - Davidson v. State

Davidson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1958

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
2
states following
December 1995
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently December 1995

4 federal appellate · 8 state decisions

6019581960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 90 Okla. Crim. 435 - Hilyard v. State · 21 Okla. Crim. 1 - Little v. State · 72 Okla. Crim. 339 - Blumhoff v. State · 90 Okla. Crim. 276 - Kilpatrick v. State · 1 Okla. Crim. 307 - George v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Generally, if a defendant is not satisfied with court’s instructions, it is his duty to request what he considers to be the proper instructions and unless the request is made, reviewing court will not deem the failure of trial court to give an instruction reversible error unless it is of such fundamental nature as to deny defendant a fair and impartial trial.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““Whether or not trial court should give an instruction on the effect of the defendant’s possession of recently stolen property, in the absence of a request, is to be determined by the facts in each individual case and where no request is made it will not be deemed error unless such instruction is of such materiality as to render it fundamental.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.