State v. Hunt’s Empirical Analysis
1958
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 4 Okla. Crim. 1 - Stack v. State · 3 Okla. Crim. 129 - Cox v. State · 3 Okla. Crim. 138 - Cox v. State · 11 Okla. Crim. 578 - Markeson v. State · 7 Okla. Crim. 108 - Cumberledge v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"All persons who are concerned in the commission of an offense are `principals' and should be prosecuted and convicted as such ..."”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Parrott v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.