Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 330 S.C. 189 - State v. Mitchell

State v. Mitchell’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

63
cited by 63 later decisions
1
states following
July 2013
most recently cited

63 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 63 later decisions — most recently July 2013 · most notably State v. Quattlebaum (2000), State v. Johnson (1999)

63 state decisions

330199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Delaware v. Van Arsdall · State v. Von Dohlen · State v. Bell · State v. Smith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 63 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “) (citations omitted). In Mitchell , the Supreme Court articulated the necessary showing required from an appellant who asserts an infringement on his right to meaningful cross examination: [A] criminal defendant states a violation of the Confrontation Clause by showing that he was prohibited from engaging in otherwise appropriate cross-examination designed to show a prototypical form of bias on the part of the witness, and thereby”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Grace · State v. Mizzell
  2. “Cross Examination A trial court's ruling on the proper scope of cross examination will not be disturbed absent a manifest abuse of discretion. State v. Mitchell, 330 S.C. 189 , 498 S.E.2d 642 (1998). This rule, however, is subject to the Sixth Amendment's guarantee of a defendant's right to”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Grace

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.