In re White’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
September 2000
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on In the Matter of Peeples · In re Wright · In re Parker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) Canon 1(A), by failing to establish, maintain and enforce high standards of conduct in the two matters at issue; (2) Canon 2(A), by failing to respect and comply with the law, and act at all times in a manner that promotes public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary; (3) Canon 2(B), by allowing social or other relationships to influence his conduct or judgment, and by lending the prestige of his judicial office to advance the prívate interests of another; (4) Canon (3)(B)(5), by failing to perform judicial duties without bias or prejudice; and (5) Canon 3(B)(7), by initiating, permitting or considering ex parte communications, or considering other communications made to him outside the presence of the parties concerning a pending proceeding.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In Re Sessions
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.