Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

330 So. 2d 38

Docket No. 75-1005.

Kucera v. Kucera

Frank E. KUCERA, Appellant, v. Jane H. KUCERA, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1976-03-26

Relies on 122 So. 2d 24 - Chaachou v. Chaachou · Worley v. Phillips · 114 So. 2d 726 - Cristiani v. Cristiani

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1976-03-26

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently June 2008

6 state decisions

201976198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Edna L. Caruso, Howell, Kirby, Montgomery, D'Aiuto & Dean, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

¶2Philip J. Gouze, Law Offices of James P. O'Flarity, Palm Beach, for appellee.

¶3PER CURIAM.

¶4Upon due consideration of the briefs and the circumstances reflected in the record on appeal we are of the opinion that the trial court erred in entering its order disbursing attorney's fees to the appellant-husband's additional counsel.

¶5Appellant had previously deposited certain monies with his original counsel of record during the pendency of dissolution proceedings. As it appeared that original counsel was to be called as a witness at the final hearing appellant found it necessary to secure additional counsel. Subsequently, additional counsel filed a motion for relief of counsel and attorney's fees. Pursuant thereto the trial court entered an order adjudicating the amount of the attorney's fees and directing that such fees be paid from funds held by appellant's original counsel.

¶6According to the established case law in Florida, absent a claim of a charging lien a lawyer's disputed claim for fees must be prosecuted in a separate action at law. Cristiani v. Cristiani,114 So.2d 726 (Fla. App.2d 1959); Chaachou v. Chaachou,122 So.2d 24 (Fla.App.3d 1960); Worley v. Phillips,264 So.2d 42 (Fla.App.2d 1972); Weksler v. Stamatinos,314 So.2d 616 (Fla. App.3d 1975); see also 3 Fla.Jur., Attorneys *39 at Law, § 69, et seq. Moreover, even where a charging lien is involved, in the absence of statute or contract providing otherwise, the lien attaches to the proceeds of a judgment or settlement or to any funds recovered by an attorney for his client so that disbursement is contingent upon such circumstances. 3 Fla.Jur., supra, §§ 76, 77.

¶7Accordingly, the order disbursing attorney's fees is vacated and set aside and the cause remanded for such other proceedings as are consistent herewith.

¶8WALDEN, C.J., and CROSS and MAGER, JJ., concur.

/330/so2d/38 · .json · Public domain