Ex Parte Miller’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
11 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 299th Judicial District Court)
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · North Carolina v. Pearce · Williams v. People of State of New York · Monge v. California · Evitts v. Lucey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]hile there is significant expert opinion testimony, documentary materials, and lay testimony in this record that might support a finding of mental retardation, there is also sufficient evidence, including expert and lay opinion testimony, as well as written records, to support the trial court's finding that applicant failed to prove that he is mentally retarded. In such a situation, I defer to the trial court's credibility determinations and . . . adopt its ultimate findings of fact. Based on those findings and my independent review, I agree with the Court's decision to deny relief.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“uncommunicated character” evidence because”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.