Isassi v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
120 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District)
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1503 · 18 U.S.C. § 1508
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Kolender v. Lawson · Rogers v. Tennessee · Badders v. United States · Hooper v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 120 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Section 240.02 ... is comparable to our Penal Code § 36.03 (Coercion of. Public Servant or Voter) and § 36.04 (Improper Influence) together.”).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hines v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.