Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

330 S.W.3d 767

Coffman v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 9, 2010

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2010-11-09

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently October 2017

3 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2010-11-09

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1 ORDER

PER CURIAM:

¶2 Daniel Coffman appeals from the motion court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. Coffman contends that his trial counsel was ineffective in: (1) failing to call police officer Joseph Jackson as a witness at trial; (2) failing to call Goldina McKnight and Dr. Steven Scott to testify at trial; (3) failing to call criminalist Shawn Bailes as a witness at trial; and (4) conceding in closing argument that the victim had not consented to sexual intercourse with Coffman. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

/330/sw3d/767 · .json · Public domain