Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 330 U.S. 248 - Northern Pac Ry Co v. United States

Northern Pac Ry Co v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

330 U.S. 248 · 1947

Citation profile

47
cited by 47 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
July 1987
most recently cited

16 federal appellate · 9 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 47 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 1987 · most notably United States v. Haldeman (1976), General Electric Co. v. Southern Construction Co. (1967)

16 federal appellate · 9 district ·

28019471950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedNorthern Pac. Ry. Co. v. United States (from Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Burke v. Southern Pacific Railroad · Piedmont Northern Ry Co v. Interstate Commerce Commission · Russell v. Sebastian · Slidell v. Grandjean · United States v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “* * * in general the use to which the property is to be put is the controlling test of its military or naval character. * * *”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Civilian agencies may service the armed forces or act as adjuncts to them.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “31 Applying this test, it was held, in the Northern Pacific R. Company case, that copper cable for use in the installation of degaussing equipment on a cargo vessel (a defense against magnetic mines), lumber for construction of a munitions plant, Marine Corps pontons, bowling alleys for a naval air base at Dutch Harbor, Alaska, and liquid paving asphalt for an airport necessary for national defense at Cold Bay, Alaska, were transported”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.