Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 330 U.S. 395 - United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America v. United States Bay Counties Dist Council of Carpenters

United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America v. United States Bay Counties Dist Council of Carpenters’s Empirical Analysis

330 U.S. 395 · 1947

Citation profile

984
cited by 984 later decisions
79
cited 79 times by the Supreme Court
30
states following
February 2024
most recently cited

483 federal appellate · 21 district · 202 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 984 later decisions (79 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2024 · most notably Jackson v. Virginia (1979), United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs (1966)

483 federal appellate · 21 district · 202 state decisions — followed in 30 states

2510194719501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedLumber Products Ass'n v. United States (from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co. · United States v. Atkinson · Weems v. United States · Apex Hosiery Co. v. Leader · Sibbach v. Wilson & Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 984 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “No officer or member of any association or organization, and no association or organization participating or interested in a labor dispute, shall be held responsible or liable in any court of the United States for the unlawful acts of individual officers, members, or agents, except upon clear proof of actual participation in, or actual authorization of, such acts, or of ratification of such acts after actual knowledge thereof.”
    12 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[a] failure to charge correctly is not harmless, since the verdict might have resulted from the incorrect instruction”
    11 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “change[ ] the substantive law of agency,”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.