Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 330 WIS2D 243 - State v. Peebles

State v. Peebles’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
June 2013
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Malloy v. Hogan · Kastigar v. United States · Estelle v. Smith · Culombe v. Connecticut · Minnesota v. Murphy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a probationer's statements are compelled if he or she must choose between providing them or jeopardizing his or her conditional liberty by remaining silent.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “then gave his statements, at least in part, because he was required to take lie detector tests.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Sex Counseling/register/be compliant with Sex Offender Program.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.