Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 330 WIS2D 500 - State v. Baldwin

State v. Baldwin’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

15 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Crawford v. Washington · Reynolds v. States · Giles v. California · United States v. Carlson · 90 Wis. 2d 97 - Charolais Breeding Ranches, Ltd. v. FPC Securities Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “notice of appeal must sufficiently identify the order being appealed from.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “[t]he requirements of authentication or identification as a condi tion precedent to admissibility are satisfied by evidence sufficient to support a finding that the matter in question is what its proponent claims.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.