Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 330 Wis. 2d 531 - State v. Hampton

330 Wis. 2d 531 - State v. Hampton’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
April 2020
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Michigan v. Mosley · Davis v. United States · North Carolina v. Butler · McNeil v. Wisconsin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] narrowly crafted exception to this rule exists . . . which permits appellate review of an order denying a motion to suppress evidence, notwithstanding a guilty plea.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Ordinarily, a guilty plea waives all nonjurisdictional defects and defenses.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “HAMPTON: Are you guys gonna leave? DETECTIVE HEIER: Yeah. If you wanna talk to a lawyer, we’re not going to talk to you.... You’re in charge.... If you want a lawyer, I respect that and I’ll honor that.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.