Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 331 A2D 329 - United States v. Malcolm

United States v. Malcolm’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
March 2011
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently March 2011

10 state decisions

7019751980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3500 · 29 U.S.C. § 159 (§ 9 of the National Labor Relations Act)

Relies on Wong Sun v. United States · Aguilar v. Texas · Spinelli v. United States · Jones v. United States · Draper v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “After a witness called by the United States has testified on direct examination, the court shall, on motion of the defendant, order the United States to produce any statement (as hereinafter defined) of the witness in the possession of the United States which relates to the subject matter as to which the witness has testified. If the entire contents of any such statement relate to the subject matter of the testimony of the witness, the court shall order it to be delivered directly to the defendant for his examination and use.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[I]f there is one thing which is crystal clear about the Jencks Act, it is that compulsory disclosure by the government of documents in its possession is limited to prior statements of a witness who has testified.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.