Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 331 A.2d 375 - State v. Hanson

State v. Hanson’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
2
states following
July 1991
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently July 1991

15 state decisions

110197519801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Speiser v. Randall · United States v. Calderon · Cephus v. United States · De Tienne v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““that if a motion for judgment of acquittal filed at the conclusion of the State’s case in chief has been overruled and defendant proceeds to present evidence in his own behalf, defendant ‘waives’ the issue of the sufficiency of the State’s prima facie case . . . .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““the ‘waiver’ rule thus remains consistent with the constitutional mandate of Win-ship.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.