Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 331 Ark. 402 - Strickland v. State

Strickland v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
April 2016
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently April 2016

16 state decisions

80199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bennett v. State · McConaughy v. State · Danzie v. State · Welch v. State · Newman v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is true, that in criminal cases, issues raised, including constitutional issues, must be presented to the trial court to preserve them for appeal. Welch v. State, 330 Ark. 158 , 955 S.W.2d 181 (1997). Moreover, it is incumbent upon an appellant to obtain a ruling from the trial court in order to preserve an argument for appeal. Akins v. State, 330 Ark. 228 , 955 S.W.2d 483 (1997); Newman v. State, 327 Ark. 339 , 939 S.W.2d 811 (1997); Danzie v. State, 326 Ark. 34 , 930 S.W.2d 310 (1996). Because the trial court never ruled on an objection to the exclusion of this time period, the argument is not properly before us on appeal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.