Chernack v. Radlo’s Empirical Analysis
331 F.2d 170 · 1964
Citation profile
24 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently February 1995 · most notably United States v. One Motor Yacht Named Mercury (1975), Peymann v. Perini Corp. (1974)
24 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. United States · Stoner v. California · Gorin v. United States · Esso Standard Oil Co. v. Secatore's, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“such * * * parts of the [testimony] * * * as [it] * * * deems it essential for the judges of the court to read in order to decide”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“imposes a burden upon (the appellant) to print all of the evidence, good and bad, material to the point he wishes to raise,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.