United States v. Bailey’s Empirical Analysis
331 F.2d 218 · 1964
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Sorrells v. United States · Black v. United States · Simmons v. United States · Stanley v. United States · Way v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Except for the first Banks case, no authority has been cited to us which sustains the petitioner’s position in this case. On the contrary, the courts have been practically unanimous in holding the defense of entrapment cannot be used by collateral attack under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 . Some of these decisions are: Stanley v. United States, 9 Cir., 239 F.2d 765 ; Turner v. United States, 8 Cir., 262 F.2d 643 , 645; Way v. United States, 10 Cir., 276 F.2d 912 , 913; Davis v. United States, 5 Cir., 205 F.2d 516 ; United States v. Buford, D.C.E.D.Wis., 165 F.Supp. 940 , 941.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.