Northeast Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board’s Empirical Analysis
331 F.2d 579 · 1964
Citation profile
52 federal appellate · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 70 later decisions — most recently September 1997 · most notably Wait Radio v. Federal Communications Commission (1969), Brennan v. Gilles & Cotting, Inc. (1974)
52 federal appellate · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 5 U.S.C. § 1007
Relies on Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United States · United States v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific R. · Secretary of Agriculture v. United States · National Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 70 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The Board is free, of course, to make changes in policy, but the seriousness of this one, if that is what it is, would call not only for deep and mature thought, but for the assembly of the most cogent reasons. In the Board’s opinion I find neither. [Northeast Airlines v. C.A.B., 1 Cir. 1964, 331 F.2d 579, 589 ].” 380 F.2d at 190 .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[c]ourts ought not to have to speculate as to the basis for an administrative agency's conclusion.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“All decisions (including initial, recommended, or tentative decisions) shall become part of the record and include a statement of * * * findings and conclusions, as well as the reasons or basis therefor, upon all material issues of fact, law, or discretion presented on the record.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Austin v. Jackson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.