Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

331 F.2d 604

Docket No. 15678.

United States v. Flowers

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided May 13, 1964.

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1964-05-13

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently September 1975

10 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on 227 F. Supp. 1014 - United States v. Flowers

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1964-05-13

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1W. Rowlett Scott, Memphis, Tenm (court appointed), on the brief, for appellants.

¶2Thomas L. Robinson, U. S. Atty., Odell Horton, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., Western-District of Tenn., Memphis, Tenn., on the brief, for appellee.

¶3Before PHILLIPS and EDWARDS, Circuit Judges, and McALLISTER, Senior Circuit Judge.

¶4ORDER.

¶5The above cause coming on to be heard upon an appeal from a motion to correct the sentences imposed by the District Court upon appellants, and the Court being duly advised:

¶6Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the order denying the motion to correct the sentences heretofore imposed be and is hereby affirmed, in accordance with the opinion of Judge Boyd, reported in 227 F.Supp. 1014 (W. D.Tenn.).

/331/f2d/604 · .json · Public domain