Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 331 F.2d 706 - American Concrete Agricultural Pipe Association v. No-Joint Concrete Pipe Co., a Corporation, American Concrete Agricultural Pipe Association v. Honorable Harry C. Westover, Judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, Central Division

American Concrete Agricultural Pipe Association v. No-Joint Concrete Pipe Co., a Corporation, American Concrete Agricultural Pipe Association v. Honorable Harry C. Westover, Judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, Central Division’s Empirical Analysis

1964

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
2
states following
February 1997
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently February 1997

8 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions

801964197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bankers Life & Casualty Co. v. Holland · Goldlawr, Inc. v. Heiman · Phillips v. Negley · Whitehouse v. Illinois Central Railroad · Giusti v. Pyrotechnic Industries, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Any suit, action or proceeding under the antitrust laws against a corporation may be brought not only in the judicial district whereof it is an inhabitant, but also in any district wherein it may be found or transacts business; and all process in such cases may be served in the district of which it is an inhabitant, or wherever it may be found.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.