Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

331 F.2d 841

Docket No. 21070.

Parker v. Franklin

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1964-05-18

3 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1964-05-18

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently December 1991

8 federal appellate ·

701964197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

James J. Carter, Montgomery, Ala., Thomas D. Samford, III, Samford & Samford, Opelika, Ala., Thomas B. Hill, Jr., Hill, Hill, Stovall & Carter, Montgomery, Ala., for appellant.

Fred D. Gray, Montgomery, Ala., Constance Baker Motley, Jack Greenberg, James M. Nabrit, III, New York City, for appellee Franklin.

Harold H. Greene, David Rubin, Peter S. Smith, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Burke Marshall, Asst. Atty. Gen., Ben Hardeman, U. S. Atty., Washington, D. C., for the United States.

Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, WISDOM, Circuit Judge, and McRAE,* District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

This Court adopts the opinion of the Honorable Frank M. Johnson as the opinion of this Court, and affirms the judgment of the Court with the following modification.

¶2

The trial court found that the appellee Franklin had been denied admission to the graduate school of Auburn University for one reason only: "Franklin was rejected on one basis: He had not been graduated from a college that held an accredited status with Southern Association of Colleges and Schools."1 The court made no finding of fact that the appellant had failed expeditiously to consider, process, or accept applications of Negro applicants upon the same terms as white or that he had failed or refused to consider, process or accept applications of qualified Negroes because of the race of such applicants. We think the record discloses that, once the accreditation requirement was struck down by the court, the handling of the application by appellee indicates that there was no such failure on the part of the appellant. Thus, we conclude that paragraphs numbered 4 and 5 of the injunctive order of the court, not being based on findings of fact, should be eliminated.

¶3

As thus modified the order is affirmed.

Notes:

*

District Judge, sitting by designation

1

Franklin was a graduate of Alabama State College, one of two colleges still, by statute, operated solely for Negroes. The six white Alabama colleges and universities were all accredited. The two Negroes colleges were not

/331/f2d/841 · .json · Public domain