Hodgson v. Pinto

Submitted May 19, 1964.

Decided May 28, 1964.

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently May 1964

2 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1964-05-28

¶1Thomas Hodgson, pro se.

¶2Eugene T. Urbaniak, Deputy Atty. Gen., Trenton, N. J. (Arthur J. Sills, Atty. Gen., of New Jersey, on the brief), for appellee.

¶3Before KALODNER, GANEY and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5On review of the record we find no error. The Order of the District Court of January 21, 1964 dismissing the complaint will be affirmed.